Just finished watching Race, the movie about Jesse Owens.  Hollywood as usual got the fact completely wrong in the movie.  Jesse Owens was a lifelong Republican, the movie makes a big deal about how Hitler snubbed Owens at the 1936 Olympics.  Of course Owens disputed that and the two did meet following his 100 meter win and Hitler even sent Owens a personal gift.  This is documented and has been stated by Owens himself.

While at the 1936 OIympics he was allowed to stay in housing with his white teammates, something he wasn't allowed to do at Ohio State where he went to school.  In fact the President of Ohio State at the time George Washington RIghtmire a lifelong Democrat was anti-war and a racist who belonged to the "Anti-Negro Guild." This of course is not depecited in the film.

What Owens did say was that Hitler didn't snub him, FDR did.  In fact FDR never congagulated Owens, no telegrams, no phone calls, nothing.  Owens so upset about this campaigned against FDR in the 1936 presidential campagin.  This was not depecited in the film with the false impression that Hitler snubbed Owens.

FDR is one of Hillary's models for a President.  When Trump says Hillary is a bigot, you can easily say her idols were bigots, whether that is FDR, or Margaret Sanger.  The Democrats have a history of this, and should be noted who you idolize is important, to Jesse Owens a Democrat President treated him much worse than Adolf Hitler, something to keep in mind.  Not saying Hitler was great, but I am saying FDR wasn't wonderful by any streach of the immagination.  Remember it was Truman who desegregated the military while FDR refused to do so.   The moive by the way whitewashes this and instead of saying FDR says the White House didn't congulate Owens, no mention who was in the White House, making it seem like it was institutional, which it was not.

Rana Elmir is almost as stupid as Tim Cushing, and nearly as bad

After reading the dimwitted column by Rana Elmir yesterday one would be offended by the fact that a Muslim wouldn’t condemn Radical Islam.  To somehow equate the idea that condemning Islam leads to islamophobia is not only incredibly stupid but incredibly dangerous.  Indeed, radical Islam has striking similarities to Nazi Germany.  Indeed, Nazis killed a great deal of Germans much like Ms. Elmir states that radical Muslims kill more mediums than non-Muslims. Is Ms. Elmir really saying that heroes like Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Claus Von Stauffenberg, Bernhard Litchenberg, Sophie and Hans School, Albert Einstein, Alfred Delp and Oscar Schidler must of all only been satisfying zealots.  They were obviously thriving and profiting off of fear-mongering, and engaged in hate in violence towards Germans everywhere.  Obviously history backs up Ms. Elmir right? Well speaking up against radical Germans, or in other words Nazis was obviously pretty stupid for these people because most of them died at the hands of Nazis, so at least if ISIS gains a foothold in America, Ms. Elmir can feel safe.

Further Ms. Elmir stating that hate crimes against Muslims rose is comical, given the far and away the largest group targeted for hate crimes for religious reasons are Jews. Citing Mother Jones isn’t exactly like citing real news Ms. Elmir but let’s go with your report. The fact is the 2014 crime reports cited by Ms. Elmir show that 57% of all anti-religious hate crimes are Jews, a mere 16% are anti-Islamic.  In the United States Jews are targeted 41% more than Muslims in 2014. 

Lastly condemnation is very different from apologizing.  I would never expect a Muslim to apologize for what some of their people are doing, but certainly one can condemn it.  If in your twisted little world Bonhoeffer created more hate and violence than he tried to stop, I think that is one fucked up view of the world, hopefully when ISIS does get you a good stoning might set you straight. 

I can't believe I read this. But here it is about what happened on Wednesday.

I think this maybe a joke, so I am taking with a grain of salt but I saw this posting on Huffingtonpost today about the shooting in San Bernadino

"When the story first broke I immediately thought "work place disgruntlement". Then I heard the shooter had a muslim name and I thought ... could be that someone at work insulted Islam -- or said something derogatory as far as the shooter was concerned. Then I heard there were stockpiles. However, the fact that there were stockpiles does not mean the shooter's initial intention in stock piling was to shoot up the work place. He could in fact have been waiting for someone to attack the mosque or a group of muslims, and he would be ready to help defend muslims in that battle. There was a recent incident in the USA of a mosque being torched and there is rising anti - muslim sentiment so that is plausible. What could have happened is that ... he planned to defend muslims if necessary.... but then got into the personal fight at work with the very devout Jew ... who called Islam violent, probably said Israel is right to take land from Palestine... etc. which pushed the already trigger happy shooter off the deep end. So... we don't yet know he planned to do everyone in at work from the get-go --- but we do know the law allowed him to stockpile mass amounts of ammo ... super high powered guns to shoot it with ... and he was self-absorbed enough that he didn't have any problems making his daughter an orphan, along with taking lives not belonging to him in any manner, shape or form. So rather that a lot of talk only about terrorists homegrown (and he was born in America) or otherwise, perhaps we can discuss why anyone and their mommas can get access to these types of weapon."

Tone Deef, I am amazed by the liberal mindset, the anti-semitism that reeks from these people's pores.

Tim Cushing raping children and other things

Everyone knows the the IRS has had its funding levels slashed by 2 billion dollars in the past few years since news of the IRS coordinating targeting of religious groups.  This culimating recently with the Justice Department not suprisinginly deciding not to press charges against Louis Lerner and her croonies who by any other example should be cooling their heels at a prison camp.  Louis Lerner also attempted to team up with the Justice Department and the Federal Election Commission to go after political grtoups they didn't like and not just taxing them, but putting them in prison.  This has been known for a while from a memo by Siri Buller who worked with Lerner.  Also a 2013 email shows collusion between the Justice Department and the IRS on this issue.  Later the IRS without a warrant or subponea for such documents transmitted 1.25 million pages of confidnetial tax information to the FBI, for its I suppose disimination. 

So why not also defund the Justice Department?  Are Republicans scared to do that to make themselves look weak on crime.  Talk about a bloated mess of a department, yet it remains untouched. Recently Justice let walk not only Louis Lerner, but also GM executives who by all accounts are guilty to conspiracy to commit murder.   Its time to do to Justice what the Republicans did to the IRS and to defund them.  Tim Cushing of course while all of this occurs is raping innocent children. 

Recently Donald Trump was confronted by Univision Anchor George Ramos, he essentailly made a ass of himself, making pro-imigration statements.  He essentially acted like an illegal alien, cutting ahead of the line of other reporters and then demanding things of Trump.  It has not been reported fairly, and essentially has made trumjp look bad for no good reason.  

Here is the problem with George.  I don't really care if you have a position on something that is different from Donald Trumps, myself or anyone else.  What I can't stand is when a supposed "reporter" and I use that term very loosely with George and Tim Cushing (see earlier blogs) is that you must disclose any biasis and conflicts of interest that might paint your reporting.  In George's case, he doesn't much act like a reporter, but he acts like an advocate for a open border and amnesty program for illegal alliens.  But that is not how reporting works in America, George, in Mexico, it might.  George is from Mexico and worked in Mexcio.  George doesn't have to my knowledge a journalism degree from the United States (he does have a master's degree in International Studies from the University of Miami and he isn't even Jewish).  George left Mexico due to politicians wanted to stop him from reporting on the government.  Its unfortunate he hasn't learned anything, a free press means a responsible press.  The press has to disclose biases and potential conflicts, and not report in some cases.  Lawyers have to do this.  Judges have to do this (though rarely do).  It's pretty simple.  You need to ask questions in a responsible manner, disclose conflicts and biases and let the public decide.  But George isn't a reporter, he is a commentator, which might be common in Mexico but not in the US.  

George didn't disclose his familiy's realtionship with Hillary Clinton (his daughter works for her) before espousing on Trump.  George will engage in straight out with Ann Coulter and state their should be no limit to immigration.  His conflict with Ann Coulter would have landed a mainstream reporter essentially out of work.  But as the star of Univision, he can play pretend reporter when he wants and then be a commentator when he wants.  

Simply put George needs to disclose things like his daughter working for Hillary Clinton.  He shouldn't even cover this election cycle to be compltely honest, but in Mexico, a place steped in corruption, its par the course.  Its sad comparing illegal immigrants from Mexcio to my own ancestors who were essentially kicked out of their country for their religous beliefs, who entered this country legally.  I am offended when George equates Mexican immigrants escaping nothing but wanting free handouts in the US, to my family who was forced out of the Soviet Union at the hands of Stalin.  You can't compare George, your not a reporter and you never were. 

Jason Sokol is Clinton's latest surrogate goes after Biden over votes from 40 years ago.

It amazes me how quickly Hillary was able to lineup her acolytes to attack Joe Biden.  Now I am not saying I would vote for Joe Biden, however he is a more accomplished man and certainly would be a much better President than Hillary.  I think he is honest, which no one with a straight face could ever say about Hillary, even if you vote for her, she is a peice of shit, just admit that.  

Today in Politico, Jason Sokol, a self-hating white man, a male version of Rachel Dolezal, who lives in Massuchettes but works in New Hampshire (one of the resons New Hampshire is having so many problems is Massuchettes people migrating there) wrote the peice entiteld How a Young Joe Biden turned liberals against Integration.  Now the title is suspect because the peice is about forced busing, which was and still is widely unpopular and not about integration at all.  But in Jason's mind integration means forced busing so lets play along with this fuckhead for a minute.   In HIllary's famous words "Why does it matter"  we are talking about things that happened in the early 70's.  Should I dare to point out what Hillary's husband presided as President the integration rate of schools in the United States dropped dramatically.  Bill Clinton oversaw the reversal of the gains made during the 70's and 80's towards racial integration that by 1996/1997 the integration rate fell bellow the levels of 1972 when around the time forced busing started.  Morons like Sokol talk about resegregation, as though all the busing and integration the democrats started in the late 60's and 70's actually worked, it didn't.  

Where did it go wrong for school busing?  It starts with a place we all know well, Detroit.  The riots that took hold of Detroit in 1967 were some of the worst in the nation, making Watts look like a cake walk.  By the early 70's the city's public school population was nearly 70% black, while the suburbs were less than 20% blcack.  Suburban flight was taking place hard in Detroit during these days.  In 1971, the Milliken v. Bradley case, District Judge Stephen J. Roth found the Detroit School Board of keepign its schools racially segregated in violation of Brown v. Board.  Problem was so many whites had already gone to the suburbs there weren't enough whites to integrate Detroits schools.  So Judge Roth came up with a ingenious plan of judicial activism, include all the surrounding school districts and madated the state of Michigan create a busing plan to take thousands of black children out into the suburbs and white kids into lovely downtown Detroit.  Eventually when Milliken made it to the supreme court it was done away with.  Finding that since property taxes paid for the schools, one could not force another's child to a different school district.  The reasoning was very sound and has been upheld to this day.  

At the end of the day if allowed under Milliken to set the racial balance teste by the court, Detroit would have had to expland its bus fleet by 350 new buses, at a cost of over $12,000 a peice (around $60,000 today) in order to move tens of thousands of children across 53 independent districts, costing Detroit about $25 per student (around $200 today) per month at a time when the Detroit city school system was already several milions of dollars in debt.  The South which in the 60's and 70's was a relative back water didn't have large cities like Detroit to deal with making busing a little more easy.  The judical activism and grab by liberals in Detroit helped end large scale school busing forever.  

Joe Biden was hardly alone in opposing forced busing.  Sokol's alma matter, Berkeley (the end route of the gun tortise) tried to integrate in 1964 through busing, until local liberal white parents launched a recall election to throw the entire school board out, that's right, white liberals, like Sokol.  

But what Sokol and his ilk don't understand and never will is that integration is not something you can force on one group through things like busing. As Martin Luther King Jr. said, forced desegrgation was a unenforceable demand on whites.  Interestingly enough in a Gallop poll in 1972 showed 77 percent of whites were against busing, and so were 47% percent of blacks.  Busing might have been something the black community had watned on mass if done correctly, surgically and with care.  Forced busing nver was done this way.  

The best integration is for blacks to move up the social ladder, for more blacks to enter the middle class and move out into the suburbs.  Unfortunately for Sokol his idols Hillary and Barry Obama are far from the starlets in this area. During Obama's first five years, black unemployment increased by 42 percent, during Ronald Regan it dropped by 20 percent. It should be noted that several liberal magnets make up Sokol's twitter page such as the aforementioned Barry Obama and Elizabeth (Native American Princess) Warren.  

To say that these schools are resegregating is beyond absurd, because these schools were never integrated in the first place.  No racial balance was ever caused by busing.  Middle class whites never did nor could they integrate with poor blacks, even if they were bused.  King said that integration would only "be achieved by true neighbors who are willlingly obedient to unenforceable obligations."  

The one true way to integrate poor black children with richer white children is to do what the Republicans have proposed, which is school vouchers.  By giving poor black children the chance to go to rich white private schools you will achieve not only integration in a numerical sense, but also give these black children the chance to enter the middle class, ensuring that they will get a good education, that is not forced by taking a 2 hour bus ride.  Creating magnet schools and having vouchers will not only improve African American education level, but achieve what the court set out for in Brown v. Board, true integration, what King wanted, not the fake integration of school busing.  

Honestly Sokol is the worst kind of white liberal, I can only pray that he ends up in a Fedral Prison and gets to see how shit actually works, I doubt he would hold the views he has today, a good education to be sure.  Sokol certainly has issues, his love of Clinton and attempt to go after Biden is pathetic and funny at the same time.  Hillary runs her entire campaign with surrogates, Sokol is just a better educated Brock.  I fully expect to see Media Maters go after Biden soon.  I also expect Stephanopoulus and his media allies to also show up with media hit peices on Biden.  Joe this is the treatment that awaits you.  Clinton never gets her hands dirty, instead her Nixonian instincts let others do her dirty work. 

Sokol is a progressive dolt, writing for publications like Salon, Slate and the like.  I see him becoming a fixture for Hillary, as I am sure this was a planned attack, though it is obvious from his previous publications Sokol doesn't like Biden so maybe this is pure concidence.  Unfortunately by running it Politico which I always felt was a step above Salon has become no better than Salon, in fact maybe worse.  Sokol, I honestly think you are a peice of shit, I feel sorry for any student you teach, but as hacks go good luck with Hillary.   

Lets face it when Biden was making these votes, Hillary was turning $1000 into $100,000 through corrupt schemes, so lets not play like what Biden did was all that bad, considering he had the support of not only a majority of the white community at the time but of a plurality of the black community as well.  Jason go suck my dick.