Rana Elmir is almost as stupid as Tim Cushing, and nearly as bad

After reading the dimwitted column by Rana Elmir yesterday one would be offended by the fact that a Muslim wouldn’t condemn Radical Islam.  To somehow equate the idea that condemning Islam leads to islamophobia is not only incredibly stupid but incredibly dangerous.  Indeed, radical Islam has striking similarities to Nazi Germany.  Indeed, Nazis killed a great deal of Germans much like Ms. Elmir states that radical Muslims kill more mediums than non-Muslims. Is Ms. Elmir really saying that heroes like Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Claus Von Stauffenberg, Bernhard Litchenberg, Sophie and Hans School, Albert Einstein, Alfred Delp and Oscar Schidler must of all only been satisfying zealots.  They were obviously thriving and profiting off of fear-mongering, and engaged in hate in violence towards Germans everywhere.  Obviously history backs up Ms. Elmir right? Well speaking up against radical Germans, or in other words Nazis was obviously pretty stupid for these people because most of them died at the hands of Nazis, so at least if ISIS gains a foothold in America, Ms. Elmir can feel safe.

Further Ms. Elmir stating that hate crimes against Muslims rose is comical, given the far and away the largest group targeted for hate crimes for religious reasons are Jews. Citing Mother Jones isn’t exactly like citing real news Ms. Elmir but let’s go with your report. The fact is the 2014 crime reports cited by Ms. Elmir show that 57% of all anti-religious hate crimes are Jews, a mere 16% are anti-Islamic.  In the United States Jews are targeted 41% more than Muslims in 2014. 

Lastly condemnation is very different from apologizing.  I would never expect a Muslim to apologize for what some of their people are doing, but certainly one can condemn it.  If in your twisted little world Bonhoeffer created more hate and violence than he tried to stop, I think that is one fucked up view of the world, hopefully when ISIS does get you a good stoning might set you straight. 

I can't believe I read this. But here it is about what happened on Wednesday.

I think this maybe a joke, so I am taking with a grain of salt but I saw this posting on Huffingtonpost today about the shooting in San Bernadino

"When the story first broke I immediately thought "work place disgruntlement". Then I heard the shooter had a muslim name and I thought ... could be that someone at work insulted Islam -- or said something derogatory as far as the shooter was concerned. Then I heard there were stockpiles. However, the fact that there were stockpiles does not mean the shooter's initial intention in stock piling was to shoot up the work place. He could in fact have been waiting for someone to attack the mosque or a group of muslims, and he would be ready to help defend muslims in that battle. There was a recent incident in the USA of a mosque being torched and there is rising anti - muslim sentiment so that is plausible. What could have happened is that ... he planned to defend muslims if necessary.... but then got into the personal fight at work with the very devout Jew ... who called Islam violent, probably said Israel is right to take land from Palestine... etc. which pushed the already trigger happy shooter off the deep end. So... we don't yet know he planned to do everyone in at work from the get-go --- but we do know the law allowed him to stockpile mass amounts of ammo ... super high powered guns to shoot it with ... and he was self-absorbed enough that he didn't have any problems making his daughter an orphan, along with taking lives not belonging to him in any manner, shape or form. So rather that a lot of talk only about terrorists homegrown (and he was born in America) or otherwise, perhaps we can discuss why anyone and their mommas can get access to these types of weapon."

Tone Deef, I am amazed by the liberal mindset, the anti-semitism that reeks from these people's pores.